Home Blog

FDA Tests for Alcohol in Imported Chocolates

The Food Safety and Drug Administration Department (FDA) has initiated a statewide drive to collect and test samples of imported chocolates amid growing concerns about the presence of alcohol in imported chocolates. The move follows reports that many imported chocolates contain traces of alcohol but fail to clearly disclose this on their packaging, potentially posing risks to consumers, especially children.

The department’s action comes after a directive from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), New Delhi, as part of its National Annual Surveillance Plan (NASP) for 2025. The directive mandates states to conduct regular product-specific sampling to identify food safety risks, including contamination, adulteration, and labelling non-compliance. For the month of May, the focus is on imported food products, with an emphasis on verifying labelling accuracy and safety.

As part of this exercise, the Karnataka FDA has collected 23 samples of imported chocolates from various retail outlets across the state. These samples will undergo comprehensive testing to check for quality, safety, and adherence to labelling regulations.

Alcohol in Imported Chocolates: A Label Transparency Issue

Alcohol in imported chocolates

According to a senior FDA official, while alcohol is not a mandatory ingredient in chocolates, certain foreign brands use it to enhance flavour, particularly in varieties such as liqueur-filled or truffle chocolates. The alcohol content in these products can range between 1 to 5 per cent by volume.

The official emphasised that any alcohol presence in food products must be explicitly mentioned on the label, as per the food safety regulations. This is especially important as children and certain vulnerable groups are legally prohibited from consuming alcohol. Failure to disclose alcohol content not only breaches labelling laws but also poses potential health risks.

“Undisclosed or excessive alcohol content in chocolates can endanger consumer health and violate food safety standards,” the official said. “Our tests will ensure that all imported chocolates comply with these standards, providing protection and clarity for consumers.”

Focus on Label Compliance

The FDA’s current sampling drive targets labelling compliance, seeking to verify that manufacturers disclose all necessary information, including the presence of alcohol in imported chocolates. Many imported chocolates popular among consumers have labels that do not adequately warn about alcohol content, raising concerns over inadvertent consumption by children or other at-risk groups.

The testing process involves both physical and chemical analysis to confirm the actual presence and concentration of alcohol in the chocolates. Products failing to meet safety criteria or labelling requirements may face regulatory action, including penalties or product recalls.

National Directive and Enforcement Strategy

Alcohol in imported chocolates

The FSSAI’s directive under the NASP aims to strengthen the enforcement of food safety standards across India. Monthly thematic drives, like the current focus on imported food items, help identify and address specific risks. The directive instructs food safety officers in all states to collect a minimum of five samples of imported foods available locally each month for laboratory analysis.

The FSSAI will enter the data collected from these tests into FoSCoS, a centralised digital platform that facilitates real-time compliance monitoring and helps authorities take prompt action against offenders. This approach aims to enhance transparency and accountability across the food supply chain.

Protecting Consumers Through Vigilance

The FDA’s initiative to examine alcohol in imported chocolates is a step towards ensuring safer food products reach consumers. It highlights the importance of accurate labelling and adherence to safety norms, particularly for items that may contain ingredients restricted for certain populations.

Consumers need to check product labels carefully and avoid chocolates that do not clearly state their contents. Parents and caregivers should be particularly vigilant with products marketed to children. The department encourages consumers to report any suspicious or non-compliant products to local food safety authorities.

For businesses dealing with imported food products, obtaining FSSAI registration is mandatory. Vakilsearch offers a straightforward FSSAI registration service to help companies comply with food safety regulations quickly and efficiently.

GST on Online Gaming: SC Remarks, ‘Fate of This Litigation Depends on Our Skill’

In a high-stakes courtroom session, the Supreme Court of India continued hearing one of the most pivotal tax disputes on GST on online gaming—whether online skill-based games should be taxed like gambling under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. The case carries major implications, with nearly ₹2.5 lakh crore at stake.

E-Gaming Federation Challenges GST On Online Gaming

Former Solicitor General and senior advocate Harish Salve, representing the E-Gaming Federation (EGF), led the charge against the current GST interpretation. He argued that online gaming platforms are being unfairly equated with gambling operations under Rule 31A of the CGST Rules.

online gaming GST

SC Judges Highlight Complexity of Case

During the proceedings, Justice JB Pardiwala lightened the mood with a pointed remark: ‘The fate of this litigation depends on our skill — we can’t take any chance.’ The statement underscored the central issue of the debate — distinguishing between games of skill and games of chance under tax law.

Actionable Claims and Misclassification

Salve’s argument hinges on the legal definition of ‘actionable claims.’ Citing the 2006 Sunrise Associates ruling, he emphasized that actionable claims typically involve a right to a future benefit, such as lottery winnings. Skill-based games like rummy or fantasy sports, he argued, don’t involve such claims.

‘Online platforms don’t offer guaranteed wins or transfers of rights,’ Salve stated. ‘They merely host competitions among players. That’s not gambling.’

The Flawed GST Approach

According to Salve, current tax rules treat the entire entry fee as taxable at 28%, rather than just the platform’s share, which is usually around 10% and already taxed at 18%. “Operators are being taxed on money that never reaches their accounts,” he pointed out.

He further argued that Rule 31A was designed for traditional gambling scenarios like horse racing and lotteries—not for games involving strategic decision-making and skill.

GST on online gaming

What’s at Stake for India’s Gaming Sector

The outcome of this case could redefine the future of India’s online gaming industry. A ruling that equates skill-based games with gambling could disrupt one of the country’s fastest-growing tech sectors, stifling innovation and investment.

Conclusion:
As the Supreme Court weighs one of the most consequential tax decisions in India’s digital era, the core question remains: should games of skill face the same GST treatment as games of chance? The decision could set a precedent that defines not only the future of online gaming but also how emerging digital economies are taxed and regulated in India. Opt for expert assisted GST registration today with Vakilsearch. 

Lodha Ventures Rebrands as Abhinandan Ventures

Lodha Ventures, the holding company led by Abhinandan Lodha, has officially rebranded itself as Abhinandan Ventures. Despite the change in name, the company will retain ownership of the original ‘Lodha Ventures’ trademark.

The group confirmed that the Lodha Ventures rebrand is not linked to the recent trademark dispute with Abhishek Lodha, managing director of Macrotech Developers. Instead, the rebranding is positioned as part of a strategic shift to align the group’s identity with its evolving business goals and innovation-led approach.

Founded in 2015, Lodha Ventures started as a platform to incubate and accelerate high-growth, consumer-centric ventures. Over the years, it has diversified into multiple sectors, including real estate (through The House of Abhinandan Lodha or HoABL), private equity (via Tomorrow Capital), and education (such as BeyondSkool).

Chairman Abhinandan Lodha stated that the group intends to capitalise on its existing brand equity and use the new name to reflect its broader vision and scope.

“Over the years, our group has become synonymous with innovation. We now want a name that reflects our identity and growth,” said Lodha in an official statement. “This shift allows us to communicate our innovation-first philosophy and our ambitious plans more effectively.”

Legal Dispute and Mediation

Lodha Ventures Rebrand

In January 2025, Macrotech Developers, led by Abhishek Lodha, filed a ₹5,000 crore lawsuit against HoABL in the Bombay High Court. The case centred around the use of the ‘Lodha’ brand name, which Abhishek Lodha claimed created confusion in the market. However, the court encouraged both parties to resolve the matter through mediation.

In April 2025, the two sides reached an amicable settlement, facilitated by retired Supreme Court Justice R.V. Raveendran. They agreed to end all court proceedings and established clearer boundaries between their businesses, particularly in relation to branding and market positioning.

A source within Abhinandan Ventures confirmed that the Lodha Ventures rebrand was not part of the settlement.

“The rebranding is not related to the legal dispute. It’s a step towards better brand recognition and aligns with the success and vision of Abhinandan Lodha’s ventures,” the source added.

Continued Use of ‘Lodha Ventures’ Trademark

Despite the name change, the group will retain the rights to use the ‘Lodha Ventures’ trademark. This allows the company to preserve the legacy and brand value associated with its original identity while marketing itself under a new name that highlights its founder.

Legal experts note that holding on to the original trademark can help avoid disruption to existing contracts, partnerships, and brand recall, while offering the flexibility to transition into the new brand identity gradually.

Expansion into High-Rise Development

Lodha Ventures Rebrand

Under the new identity, Abhinandan Ventures is also scaling up operations, particularly in the real estate sector. HoABL recently announced its entry into vertical (high-rise) developments, marking a significant shift from its established focus on plotted developments.

The company has committed ₹2,500 crore to three major high-rise projects, including:

  • A redevelopment of the former American Centre near Churchgate in south Mumbai,

  • A second premium project in South Mumbai,

  • A joint development with Mittal Builders in Naigaon, on the outskirts of Mumbai.

These three projects offer a combined development potential of 3.1 million square feet, with an estimated revenue potential of ₹3,500 crore.

Previously, HoABL concentrated on plotted development in locations such as Ayodhya and across the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, gaining recognition for creating branded land as a real estate asset. The move into vertical real estate indicates a broadening of business ambitions and an intent to compete directly in the city’s high-value property market.

Clearer Brand Strategy Moving Forward

The Lodha Ventures rebrand marks a new phase in Abhinandan Ventures’ journey. While the group remains rooted in real estate and private equity, the new identity is expected to help it build a stronger, more distinct brand separate from the Lodha Group.

The legal dispute and its resolution have also helped define clearer lines of operation between the ventures led by Abhinandan and those under Abhishek Lodha.

Abhinandan Ventures is expected to continue expanding across sectors, focusing on consumer-centric, tech-enabled businesses. Its early investments in educational platforms and CSR initiatives are likely to see further scaling, in line with its stated commitment to innovation and social impact.

Outlook

The Lodha Ventures rebrand to Abhinandan Ventures is more than a cosmetic change. It represents a broader strategy to strengthen the identity of the group as it expands into new sectors and geographies. By retaining the Lodha Ventures trademark while operating under a new name, the group seeks to preserve brand continuity while also distinguishing its vision and leadership.

Vakilsearch offers end-to-end trademark registration services to help businesses secure their brand identity and avoid legal disputes. From filing applications to handling objections, Vakilsearch ensures a smooth and efficient process for trademark protection.

Alleging GST Data Leak, Ambadas Danve Demands High-Level Probe

In a serious revelation of potential taxpayer privacy violations, Ambadas Danve, the Leader of Opposition in Maharashtra’s legislative council, has raised alarms over an alleged data leak from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) department. Danve has called for an urgent and comprehensive probe into the matter, which he believes involves the unauthorised disclosure of confidential taxpayer information.

In separate letters addressed to Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Maharashtra’s Finance Minister Ajit Pawar, Danve urged prompt intervention from both state and central authorities. His concern centers on the apparent misuse of confidential GST registration details, suggesting that businesses are receiving unsolicited bank account solicitations soon after obtaining GST registration certificates. This indicates a troubling pattern of unauthorised access to sensitive data, potentially by individuals within the GST system.

GST Data leaks

The recurring pattern of such unsolicited solicitations is a clear indication that some officials or staff within the GST system may be selling or leaking taxpayer data to external parties,’ Danve said, underlining the gravity of the situation.

According to the GST legislation, taxpayer information is supposed to remain confidential, and any unauthorised disclosure is not only a violation of the law but also a severe breach of public trust.

Danve emphasised that such breaches could lead to unfair business practices, where competitors may exploit private client information to gain an unfair advantage. ‘The compromise of data confidentiality threatens not only individual taxpayers but also the very integrity of the business ecosystem. It undermines the principles of a level playing field,’ he asserted to a leading news portal.

Expressing deep concern over the erosion of administrative credibility, Danve highlighted the significant risks posed by these breaches. The reputation of the GST system and the trust of taxpayers depend on how securely private data is managed. Any leak, if left unchecked, can have devastating long-term effects, he warned.

GST Data Leaks

In his correspondence, Danve has called for the creation of a high-level investigative committee tasked with identifying the individuals responsible for the leak. He also emphasised the need for stringent penalties for those found guilty and stressed the importance of implementing more robust data protection measures at both the central and state levels.

Conclusion:
The allegations of a GST data leak have brought to light significant concerns about the security and privacy of taxpayer information. Ambadas Danve’s call for an investigation and criminal proceedings highlights the urgent need to reinforce data protection protocols within the GST system. The potential consequences of these breaches are far-reaching, affecting both individual taxpayers and the overall credibility of India’s taxation system. Only through immediate action, thorough investigation, and stronger security measures can trust in the system be restored and taxpayer confidentiality safeguarded. For expert assisted GST registration contact Vakilsearch. Consult GST experts right away for more details. 

Two arrested for Rs 4.2 crore GST fraud in Gujarat

Two Arrested for ₹4.2 Crore GST Fraud in Bhavnagar, Gujarat
Bhavnagar,  11 May 2025 (IANS): Authorities in Gujarat’s Bhavnagar have arrested two individuals for fraudulently claiming over ₹4.2 crore in Input Tax Credit (ITC) using fake invoices. This arrest follows a recent case in Alang, where a similar GST fraud amounting to ₹8 crore was uncovered.

Details of the Arrest and Fraud Scheme
Rakesh Ganpat Rathod, a resident of Bhavnagar, was apprehended by the Bhavnagar Central GST Department. Rathod is the proprietor of M/s Krishna Machine Tools and a partner in M/s R.R. Enterprises. The identity of the second accused is still under investigation.

fake ITC arrest Gujarat
Rathod is said to have orchestrated a fraudulent scheme involving fake billing. He charged a 4% commission to generate bogus invoices for multiple suppliers. The scheme included moving funds into the firm’s bank accounts to simulate legitimate transactions. After temporarily depositing the funds, they were withdrawn in cash, the commission deducted, and the remainder handed over to a middleman.


Additionally, Rathod disclosed that a chartered accountant facilitated the creation of fake accounts and filing of fraudulent GST returns, for which the accountant received a 0.5% commission on each transaction.

Wider Scam Network and Ongoing Investigations
Authorities suspect that the fraud may involve a larger network, including the chartered accountant, middlemen, local money handlers (Shroffs), and informal courier services (Angadiya firms). Investigations into other potential suspects are already underway.
Earlier this week, Chandrabhan Maurya, the owner of M/s Ruchi Steel in Alang, was arrested for claiming fake ITC worth over ₹8 crore. To prevent further misuse, the GST Department has initiated the cancellation of GST registrations for both M/s Krishna Machine Tools and M/s R.R. Enterprises.
In total, the Gujarat GST Department has uncovered scams exceeding ₹12 crore in Bhavnagar in the past week alone.

GST fake invoice racket

Growing GST Fraud Cases and Enforcement Action
The ongoing crackdown on GST fraud in Gujarat has revealed a pattern involving the creation of fake firms, the issuance of forged invoices, and collusion between business owners, accountants, and intermediaries. In Bhavnagar, funds are temporarily deposited into bank accounts to mimic genuine business transactions, only to be withdrawn and redirected through unofficial channels.

 Authorities have already started cancelling GST registrations for firms involved in such fraudulent activities and are working to recover the falsely claimed ITC. These scams not only result in significant revenue loss but also harm fair competition in the market.
Over the last two years, Gujarat has seen over ₹500 crore in fake ITC claims, prompting the authorities to implement more stringent measures. These include advanced data analysis, inter-departmental collaboration, and AI-driven detection systems. As investigations continue, further arrests are expected, with stricter regulations anticipated to combat GST fraud more effectively.

In light of the recent crackdown on GST frauds in Gujarat, businesses facing similar tax-related challenges can benefit from expert legal support. Need help with GST issues or fake ITC claims? Vakilsearch can support you with compliance, disputes, and recovery. Our team makes tax matters simple.

Reliance Files Then Withdraws ‘Operation Sindoor’ Trademark

The trademark registration process for Operation Sindoor, the codename used for India’s military strikes in Pakistan, has seen an unusual rush of applications. Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), along with four other applicants, sought to register the term on 7 May. However, Reliance later withdrew its application, claiming that a junior employee filed it without proper authorisation.

Reliance Withdraws Application

Operaation Sindoor

RIL was the first company to file for trademark registration under Class 41 of the Nice Classification, which covers entertainment and cultural activities. The company submitted the application at 10:42 am by Jio Studios, a subsidiary of Reliance. The application covered various uses, including the production and distribution of audio, video, and still images, publishing services, and organising entertainment events.

However, in a statement issued on Thursday, Reliance clarified that the application had been filed “inadvertently” by a junior employee. The company also confirmed that it had no intention of trademarking Operation Sindoor. The phrase has become a symbol of national pride, linked to the Indian Army’s operations against terrorism.

Reliance stated, “Jio Studios, a unit of Reliance Industries, has withdrawn its trademark application, which was filed inadvertently by a junior person without authorisation.” The company added that it fully supports the Indian government and armed forces and is proud of the operation’s success.

Other Applicants Follow Suit

Following Reliance’s filing, three additional applicants submitted their applications for the trademark on the same day. The second application arrived at 11:25 am from Mumbai-based industrialist Mukesh Chetram Agrawal. He sought the trademark for both the wordmark and an associated image, covering a range of entertainment services such as musical performances, exhibitions, and the production and distribution of television programmes and radio content.

Agrawal’s advocate, Ramchandra Mandhane filed his application. Mandhane noted that this was Agrawal’s first attempt at filing a trademark under his personal name. However, he could not clarify whether Agrawal intended to use the trademark for a film or another commercial project.

The third application came at 12:16 pm from Retired Group Captain Kamal Singh Oberh, a former Air Force officer from Jammu and Kashmir. Oberh sought the trademark for Operation Sindoor in relation to entertainment, film production, and cultural activities.

The fourth application arrived at 6:27 pm from Delhi-based advocate Alok Kumar Kothari. Kothari explained that he filed the application after considering the potential commercial use of the term for a film or documentary. He stated that his primary aim was to ensure that any profits from such a project would benefit the widows of paramilitary forces and war veterans. Kothari clarified that he did not intend to profit personally from the trademark.

Trademark Law and the Issue of Public Interest

Under Indian trademark law, the first person to file for trademark registration typically gains the right to use the term commercially. Section 11 of the Trademark Act grants trademark rights based on first use or first filing. However, the law restricts trademarks that could be considered offensive, misleading, or contrary to public policy.

This issue becomes especially relevant when terms like Operation Sindoor are closely linked to national security and military operations. Some experts have raised concerns about the ethical implications of trademarking phrases associated with national pride or public sentiment.

The Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trademarks may evaluate public interest when considering registration, even though trademarking such terms is not automatically excluded. This evaluation could lead to objections or rejections if the term exploits public sentiment or misleads consumers.

Reliance’s Statement and Public Sentiment

Operation Sindoor

Reliance’s withdrawal of its trademark application follows public scrutiny and media coverage. The company’s statement emphasised that Operation Sindoor represents a symbol of the country’s bravery and resilience. Given its national significance, Reliance acknowledged that commercialising the term would be inappropriate.

“Reliance Industries has no intention of trademarking Operation Sindoor, a phrase that has now become part of the national consciousness as an evocative symbol of Indian bravery,” the company stated.

Reliance’s swift response to the backlash reflects the sensitive nature of the trademark dispute. The term Operation Sindoor has strong associations with India’s military efforts against terrorism, particularly after the Pakistan-sponsored attack in Pahalgam. This connection has transformed it into a powerful symbol of national defence and pride.

Future Implications for Trademarking Public Terms

The surge in trademark applications highlights a growing trend of filing for terms linked to public events and national sentiment. This trend raises questions about balancing intellectual property rights and the ethical use of national symbols for commercial purposes.

As Operation Sindoor represents the Indian military’s fight against terrorism, public and legal scrutiny will shape future cases. Reliance’s withdrawal may set a precedent for others seeking to register public terms, especially those of national significance.

The incident highlights complications when intellectual property intersects with national identity and sentiment. The outcome may influence future discussions on the commercial use of public terms in India.

Vakilsearch provides expert assistance in filing and opposing trademarks. Our team ensures smooth trademark registration, handles objections, and protects your brand with timely legal support.

FSSAI Training: FSSAI and BMC Launch Drive for Mumbai Street Food Vendors

In a significant initiative aimed at uplifting food hygiene standards across Mumbai’s bustling streets, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), in collaboration with the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), has launched a comprehensive training program for street food vendors. This proactive measure is part of the broader mission to ensure that the street food culture, which forms an integral part of Mumbai’s identity, also adheres to the highest standards of safety and hygiene.

400 Vendors Receive Hands-On FSSAI Training in Hygiene and Safe Food Practices

On Wednesday, approximately 400 street food vendors gathered at the Lokshahir Anna Bhau Sathe Natyagruha Auditorium in Byculla to attend an intensive training session. The program covered critical aspects such as personal hygiene, proper food handling techniques, safe food storage practices, and preventive measures to avoid contamination. These sessions are aligned with the goals of FSSAI’s flagship campaign, ‘Eat Right India’, which promotes the consumption of safe, healthy, and sustainable food.

FSSAI training

Part of Broader Effort to Boost Public Health and Enforce FSSAI Standards

The training forms a part of an ambitious Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between FSSAI and BMC, under which over 10,000 street vendors across Mumbai are expected to receive structured training on food safety protocols. Senior officials from both FSSAI and BMC were present during the session, interacting with vendors and monitoring the training process to ensure its effectiveness.

Participants responded positively, with many expressing gratitude for the opportunity to enhance their knowledge and adopt practices that could not only boost customer trust but also improve the overall quality of their offerings.

Conclusion
This joint initiative by FSSAI and BMC marks a crucial step toward institutionalizing food safety in Mumbai’s street food ecosystem. By empowering vendors with the right knowledge and tools, the program aims to build a healthier, safer urban food environment. With a series of training sessions scheduled in the coming months, this collaborative effort is set to make a lasting impact on public health and hygiene standards across the city. For expert assisted FSSAI registration choose Vakilsearch. Get more clarity on FSSAI registration, training and limit.   

India Sets Up Expert Panel to Review Indian Copyright Law Amid AI Dispute

The Indian government has formed an expert panel to assess whether the country’s copyright law can address disputes linked to artificial intelligence (AI). This move follows a legal case against OpenAI, where Indian media companies have accused the firm of using their content without permission to train its ChatGPT chatbot.

Government Forms Expert Group on Copyright and AI

In April, the Ministry of Commerce established a panel of eight experts. The panel includes legal professionals, government representatives, and industry members. An internal ministry memo, reviewed by Reuters, outlines the group’s role in analysing how AI use affects copyright protections in India.

The panel will examine current laws and recommend any necessary updates to the Copyright Act of 1957. It will look into whether the existing legal framework can handle disputes involving AI-generated content and data usage.

Indian Copyright Law

Legal Battle Between Indian Publishers and OpenAI

OpenAI is currently facing legal proceedings in the Delhi High Court. A group of Indian media organisations—including NDTV (owned by the Adani Group), Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and the Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA)—has accused the company of violating copyright rules.

They claim that OpenAI used their published content without seeking consent. According to the petition, this content trained ChatGPT, giving the chatbot the ability to generate responses using the publishers’ work. The case could set a new standard for how AI firms operate in India.

OpenAI Defends Its Data Practices

OpenAI has rejected the allegations. The company maintains that it trains its models using publicly available data, which it claims does not breach Indian copyright law. OpenAI also provides a tool that allows websites to opt out if they do not want their content used for model training.

The firm has not commented on the ongoing case but insists that its data collection methods follow local and global legal standards.

Indian Copyright Law

Global Context: Similar Cases in Other Countries

Similar disputes have emerged in courts across the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. Authors, musicians, and media outlets in these regions have also accused AI firms of using their work without permission.

These lawsuits highlight a growing concern among content creators. Many worry that AI companies are building profitable tools using original material without offering compensation or credit.

Indian Copyright Law Faces Scrutiny

India’s Copyright Act, originally passed in 1957, does not directly address AI. While the Indian copyright law has undergone several amendments, legal experts argue that it does not fully cover complex digital technologies or modern data practices.

The new expert panel will study these gaps. It will also review how other countries handle similar issues and whether Indian law should include clauses specific to AI-generated content and data training.

Possible Outcomes for the Tech and Media Sectors

The Delhi High Court’s ruling could significantly affect the Indian media and tech industries. If the court rules in favour of the publishers, AI companies may need to revise how they collect and use data. They might also need to seek licences from content owners.

A judgement in favour of OpenAI, however, may raise concerns among publishers and could push the government to introduce stronger legal protections. In either scenario, the case will likely influence India’s AI policy in the coming years.

Ministries Remain Silent on the Matter

The Ministries of Commerce and Information Technology have not issued any public statements. They also did not respond to questions from the media.

The government’s decision to form the expert panel suggests a growing awareness of the legal challenges that AI creates. It also shows a willingness to update laws in response to emerging technologies.

Panel to Submit Recommendations to the Government

The memo does not include a deadline for the panel’s report. However, the group is expected to hold consultations with legal experts, technology companies, and content creators. The panel will then submit its findings and proposals to the government for consideration.

Stakeholders from both the media and tech sectors will be watching closely. The recommendations could lead to new legal obligations for AI developers or offer stronger protections for publishers and creators.

If you’re concerned about how AI affects your copyright or want to protect your original content, Vakilsearch offers expert legal support. From copyright registration to policy reviews, our team ensures your rights stay protected in the digital age.

Samsung $520 million tax demand challenged in India by Samsung.

Samsung $520 million tax demand under scrutiny in India.

Samsung $520 million tax demand has been challenged by the company before an Indian tribunal, arguing that its import practices matched those previously followed by Reliance Industries. The case involves alleged misclassification of telecom equipment imported between 2018 and 2021, which Samsung supplied to Reliance Jio. According to Indian tax officials, the classification enabled Samsung to avoid customs duties ranging from 10% to 20%.

The case makes Samsung the latest foreign firm to challenge India’s customs duty assessments. In a similar instance, German automaker Volkswagen is contesting a $1.4 billion tax claim for misclassifying imported components.

 

Filing Reveals Samsung Cites Awareness by Authorities

In a 281-page filing submitted to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Mumbai, Samsung said Indian authorities were aware of its classification method for years. The company pointed to Reliance Jio’s earlier practice of importing the same equipment without paying tariffs until it was warned in 2017. Samsung claims it was never informed of this warning and that customs officials never questioned its import classification during the 2018–2021 period.

‘The classification adopted by the appellant was known to the authorities, however the same was never questioned,’ the filing reads. Samsung alleges that Reliance failed to communicate the 2017 warning, contributing to the current dispute.

$601 Million Total Claim and Key Equipment Involved

The case involves a component called the ‘Remote Radio Head,’ critical for 4G telecom infrastructure. Tax officials say Samsung imported nearly $784 million worth of the equipment from Korea and Vietnam and classified it under categories with lower tariffs.

In addition to the $520 million demand, authorities have fined seven Samsung employees a total of $81 million, bringing the total claim to $601 million. The company has not confirmed if the employees will file separate appeals.

Samsung tax challenge India

Samsung Accuses Officials of Rushing the Tax Order

Samsung argues the tax order issued in January 2025 was rushed and that it wasn’t given a proper chance to respond. The company says the classification had been accepted during prior inspections. Indian officials, however, accuse Samsung of knowingly violating norms to maximise profits, saying it ‘transgressed all business ethics.’

The tribunal’s decision could influence future disputes involving import classifications in India.

Samsung’s ongoing tax dispute highlights the complexities of customs regulations and the importance of proper import classification. Businesses facing similar challenges may find it difficult to navigate India’s intricate tax system. If your company is dealing with misclassification issues or facing hefty tax demands, seeking professional guidance can make all the difference. For assistance with customs compliance, tax disputes, and import classifications, consult Vakilsearch. Our expert team is here to help. 

Gujarat GST Collection: Sets New Record with Rs14,970 Crore

In April 2025, Gujarat achieved an extraordinary milestone by recording its highest-ever Goods and Services Tax (GST) collection of ₹14,970 crore, marking a notable 13% year-on-year increase, according to the latest data from the Ministry of Finance released on May 1. This impressive growth positions Gujarat as one of the leading states in GST collection, with only Maharashtra, at ₹41,645 crore, and Karnataka, at ₹17,815 crore, surpassing its performance in April 2025.

Notably, while Gujarat experienced a steady and robust growth rate of 13%, Maharashtra, the state with the highest GST collection, saw its growth rate decelerate to 11% this April, compared to 13% in the same period of the previous year. Despite this slowdown in Maharashtra, Gujarat’s economic performance remained strong, with the state’s total GST revenue for the financial year 2024-25 reaching ₹73,281 crore, which is a remarkable 14% increase from ₹64,133 crore collected in 2023-24.

GST

Gujarat’s growth in GST collections not only surpassed Maharashtra’s slower growth rate but also outperformed other major states like Tamil Nadu (₹13,831 crore), Uttar Pradesh (₹13,600 crore), and Haryana (₹14,057 crore). Additionally, smaller states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Nagaland also reported impressive growth in their GST collections, with Lakshadweep standing out with an extraordinary 287% rise.

On the national front, India’s total GST revenue for April 2025 reached a record ₹2,36,716 crore, reflecting a 12.6% year-on-year growth. Gujarat’s 13% growth in GST collection not only demonstrates its impressive economic resilience but also exceeds the national growth average, further reinforcing the state’s role as a key contributor to the country’s fiscal health.

The government attributes Gujarat’s record-breaking GST collection to its sustained economic momentum, driven by robust domestic consumption, an efficient and transparent tax collection system, and industry-friendly policies. The state’s consistent performance underscores its commitment to advancing toward the national vision of ‘Viksit Bharat,’ or a developed India.

Gujarat’s record-breaking GST collection in April 2025 highlights the state’s growing economic strength and the effectiveness of its progressive policies. By consistently outperforming many of its peers, Gujarat not only contributes significantly to the state’s economic health but also plays a crucial role in the national economy’s growth trajectory. Consult a senior GST expert from Vakilsearch for hassle free GST registration and filing.