SC Flags Issues in Delhi HC Senior Designation Process

SC questions Delhi HC's senior designation process, stating the permanent committee exceeded its mandate by recommending names instead of just assigning points.

SC cited Indira Jaising case, emphasizing the committee's role is limited to scoring applicants, while final decisions rest with the High Court's full court.

A petition challenges the designation of 70 Senior Advocates, alleging irregularities, including the exclusion of a committee member’s consent in finalizing names.

Justice Oka noted the permanent committee had six members, which contradicts SC’s prescribed guidelines in the Indira Jaising ruling on Senior Advocate designations.

SC also questioned the "deferred list" process, directing Delhi HC to clarify if deferrals align with court rules or violate the prescribed framework.

Delhi HC must respond to SC’s concerns on committee powers, composition, and rules before the next hearing following Nandrajog’s affidavit submission.

Need Expert Legal Assistance? Get hassle-free legal solutions with VakilSearch. From lawyer consultations to court filings, we’ve got you covered.

Arrow